Is Musk Safe?
Musk — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25
Musk is a PHP package with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from packagist.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Musk safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Musk has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-25).
What is Musk's trust score?
Musk has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Musk?
Musk's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Musk and who maintains it?
| Author | devv |
| Category | PHP Packages |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Packagist by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Musk
What is Musk?
Musk is a PHP package — Simple framework for RestApi with PHP async using Swoole.
How to Verify Safety
Run composer audit. Check packagist.org.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=devv/musk
Key Safety Concerns for PHP package
When evaluating any PHP package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, PHP compatibility.
Measured Signals
Musk has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Musk has a Trust Score of 48/100 (D).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Musk Safe?
What is Musk's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Musk?
Does Musk have known vulnerabilities?
Is Musk actively maintained?
Popular in PHP Packages
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.