Is Grass Safe?
Grass — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-06-01.
Exercise caution with Grass. Grass is a crypto exchange (moderate risk) with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Grass safe?
NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Grass has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.
What is Grass's trust score?
Grass has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Grass?
Grass's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Grass and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Crypto Exchanges |
| Source | N/A |
Grass Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Crypto by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Grass
What is Grass?
Grass is a crypto exchange — Grass () cryptocurrency. Nerq risk level: moderate risk..
How to Verify Safety
Check regulatory status. Verify Proof of Reserves. Review incident history.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Grass
Key Safety Concerns for crypto exchange
When evaluating any crypto exchange, watch for: regulatory compliance, security incidents, Proof of Reserves, jurisdiction.
Trust Assessment
Grass has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Grass has a Trust Score of 48/100 (D).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 50/100 |
| Popularity | 0/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.
What data does Grass collect?
Grass has a privacy score of 40/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Grass Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Grass secure?
Security score: 90/100. This meets the recommended security threshold for production use.
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Grass Security Report
How we calculated this score
Grass's trust score of 48.2/100 (D) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (0/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on June 01, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Grass Safe?
What is Grass's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Grass?
How often is Grass's safety score updated?
Can I use Grass in a regulated environment?
Popular in Crypto Exchanges
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.