Is Grass Safe?
Grass — Nerq Trust Score 42.9/100 (F grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-03-31.
Exercise caution with Grass. Grass is a software tool (moderate risk) with a Nerq Trust Score of 42.9/100 (F), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 65/100. Popularity: 5/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-31. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Grass safe?
NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Grass has a Nerq Trust Score of 42.9/100 (F). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.
What is Grass's trust score?
Grass has a Nerq Trust Score of 42.9/100, earning a F grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Grass?
Grass's strongest signal is security at 65/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Grass and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | crypto |
| Source | N/A |
Grass Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Crypto by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Grass
What is Grass?
Grass is a software — Grass () cryptocurrency. Nerq risk level: moderate risk..
How to Verify Safety
Review the project for recent activity and known issues.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Grass
Key Safety Concerns for softwares
When evaluating any software, watch for: maintenance status, security.
Trust Assessment
Grass has a Nerq Trust Score of 43/100 (F) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Grass has a Trust Score of 43/100 (F).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 65/100 |
| Privacy | 40/100 |
| Reliability | 48/100 |
| Transparency | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 60/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.
What data does Grass collect?
Grass has a privacy score of 40/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Grass Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Grass secure?
Security score: 65/100. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Grass Security Report
How we calculated this score
Grass's trust score of 42.9/100 (F) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (65/100), privacy (40/100), reliability (48/100), transparency (90/100), maintenance (60/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on March 31, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Grass safe to use?
What is Grass's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Grass?
How often is Grass's safety score updated?
Can I use Grass in a regulated environment?
Popular in crypto
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.