Is Ux Antipatterns Safe?
Ux Antipatterns — Nerq Trust Score 64.8/100 (C grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.
Ux Antipatterns is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 64.8/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Ux Antipatterns safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Ux Antipatterns has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.8/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
What is Ux Antipatterns's trust score?
Ux Antipatterns has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.8/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Ux Antipatterns?
Ux Antipatterns's strongest signal is compliance at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Ux Antipatterns and who maintains it?
| Author | cassiozen |
| Category | Design |
| Stars | 3 |
| Source | https://github.com/cassiozen/UX-antipatterns |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in design
Ux Antipatterns Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
What Is Ux Antipatterns?
Ux Antipatterns is a software tool in the design category: An agent skill for identifying and resolving UX anti-patterns in frontend development.. It has 3 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 65/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Ux Antipatterns's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Ux Antipatterns performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Ux Antipatterns's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Ux Antipatterns is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Ux Antipatterns is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 64.8/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Ux Antipatterns?
Ux Antipatterns is commonly evaluated by:
- Designers using AI to accelerate visual content creation
- Creative teams generating concept art and prototypes
- Developers building applications with AI-powered image generation
- Content creators producing visual media for digital platforms
How to read the signals: Ux Antipatterns's measured signals (security 0/100, maintenance 1/100, documentation 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Ux Antipatterns's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Ux Antipatterns's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Ux Antipatterns requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Ux Antipatterns in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=UX-antipatterns - Review the license — Confirm that Ux Antipatterns's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Ux Antipatterns
When evaluating whether Ux Antipatterns is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Ux Antipatterns processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Ux Antipatterns's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Ux Antipatterns. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Ux Antipatterns connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Ux Antipatterns's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Ux Antipatterns in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Ux Antipatterns and the EU AI Act
Ux Antipatterns is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Ux Antipatterns Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Ux Antipatterns while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Ux Antipatterns is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Ux Antipatterns and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Ux Antipatterns only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Ux Antipatterns's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Ux Antipatterns is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Ux Antipatterns
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Ux Antipatterns's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Ux Antipatterns's measured trust score of 64.8/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Ux Antipatterns is suitable for any particular use.
How Ux Antipatterns Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among design tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Ux Antipatterns's score of 64.8/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Ux Antipatterns favorably among design tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Ux Antipatterns and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Ux Antipatterns's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Ux Antipatterns's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=UX-antipatterns&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Ux Antipatterns are strengthening or weakening over time.
Ux Antipatterns vs Alternatives
In the design category, Ux Antipatterns scores 64.8/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Ux Antipatterns vs InvokeAI — Trust Score: 64.4/100
- Ux Antipatterns vs onlook — Trust Score: 63.4/100
- Ux Antipatterns vs Figma Context — Trust Score: 53.3/100
Key Takeaways
- Ux Antipatterns has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 64.8/100 (C) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among design tools, Ux Antipatterns scores above the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Ux Antipatterns Safe?
What is Ux Antipatterns's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Ux Antipatterns?
How often is Ux Antipatterns's safety score updated?
Can I use Ux Antipatterns in a regulated environment?
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.