Is Email Reply Parser veilig?

Email Reply Parser — Nerq Trust Score 66.8/100 (B--beoordeling). Op basis van analyse van 2 vertrouwensdimensies wordt het beschouwd als over het algemeen veilig maar met enkele zorgen. Laatst bijgewerkt: 2026-04-05.

Gebruik Email Reply Parser met voorzichtigheid. Email Reply Parser is een Ruby gem with a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from rubygems.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-04-05. Machineleesbare gegevens (JSON).

Is Email Reply Parser veilig?

CAUTION — Email Reply Parser has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Beveiligingsanalyse → {name} Privacyrapport →

Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Email Reply Parser?

Email Reply Parser heeft een Nerq Trust Score van 66.8/100 met het cijfer B-. Deze score is gebaseerd op 2 onafhankelijk gemeten dimensies, waaronder beveiliging, onderhoud en community-adoptie.

Beveiliging
90
Populariteit
90

Wat zijn de belangrijkste beveiligingsbevindingen voor Email Reply Parser?

Het sterkste signaal van Email Reply Parser is beveiliging met 90/100. Er zijn geen bekende kwetsbaarheden gedetecteerd. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 90/100 — community adoption

Wat is Email Reply Parser en wie onderhoudt het?

OntwikkelaarRick Olson
Categoriegems
BronN/A

Email Reply Parser op andere platforms

Dezelfde ontwikkelaar/bedrijf in andere registers:

email_reply_parser
55/100 · crates

Vergelijkbare Gems op Vertrouwensscore

erubi (68)actionview (68)multipart-post (68)aws-partitions (68)rails_serve_static_assets (68)
Bekijk alle veiligste Gems →

Compare

Email Reply Parser vs erubiEmail Reply Parser vs actionviewEmail Reply Parser vs multipart-post

Safety Guide: Email Reply Parser

What is Email Reply Parser?

Email Reply Parser is a Ruby gem — EmailReplyParser is a small library to parse plain text email content. This is what GitHub uses to display comments that were created from email replies..

How to Verify Safety

Run bundle audit. Review on rubygems.org.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=email_reply_parser

Key Safety Concerns for Ruby gems

When evaluating any Ruby gem, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Email Reply Parser has a Nerq Trust Score of 67/100 (B-) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Veelgestelde vragen

Is Email Reply Parser safe to use?
Use with some caution. email_reply_parser has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-). Strongest signal: beveiliging (90/100). Score based on security (90/100), popularity (90/100).
What is Email Reply Parser's trust score?
email_reply_parser: 66.8/100 (B-). Score based on: security (90/100), popularity (90/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=email_reply_parser
What are safer alternatives to Email Reply Parser?
In the gems category, more Ruby gems are being analyzed — check back soon. email_reply_parser scores 66.8/100.
Does Email Reply Parser have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Email Reply Parser against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
How actively maintained is Email Reply Parser?
Email Reply Parser has a trust score of 66.8/100 (B-). Below Nerq Verified threshold — conduct additional review.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Nerq-vertrouwensscores zijn geautomatiseerde beoordelingen op basis van openbaar beschikbare signalen. Ze vormen geen aanbeveling of garantie. Voer altijd uw eigen verificatie uit.

We gebruiken cookies voor analyse en caching. Privacy