Is Floki Safe?

Floki is a software tool (elevated risk) with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-24. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Floki safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Floki has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Trust Score Breakdown

Security
90
Popularity
0

Key Findings

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

Details

AuthorUnknown
Categorycrypto
SourceN/A

Safety Guide: Floki

What is Floki?

Floki is a software — Floki () cryptocurrency. Nerq risk level: elevated risk..

How to Verify Safety

Review the project for recent activity and known issues.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Floki

Key Safety Concerns for softwares

When evaluating any software, watch for: maintenance status, security.

Trust Assessment

Floki has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Detailed Score Analysis

DimensionScore
Security90/100
Privacy40/100
Reliability48/100
Transparency90/100
Maintenance60/100

Based on 5 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.

What data does Floki collect?

Floki has a privacy score of 40/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.

Full analysis: Floki Privacy Report · Privacy review

Is Floki secure?

Security score: 90/100. This meets the recommended security threshold for production use.

Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.

Full analysis: Floki Security Report

How we calculated this score

Floki's trust score of 48.2/100 (D) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), privacy (40/100), reliability (48/100), transparency (90/100), maintenance (60/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 1.8 million software entities across 18 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

This page was last reviewed on March 24, 2026. Data version: 1.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Floki safe to use?
Floki has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Score based on security (90/100), popularity (0/100).
What is Floki's trust score?
Floki: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on: security (90/100), popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Floki
What are safer alternatives to Floki?
In the crypto category, more software tools are being analyzed — check back soon. Floki scores 48.2/100.
How often is Floki's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Floki and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Current: 48.2/100 (D), last verified 2026-03-24. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Floki
Can I use Floki in a regulated environment?
Floki has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.