Is Pyth Network Safe?
Pyth Network — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Pyth Network is a crypto exchange (moderate risk) with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Pyth Network safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Pyth Network has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Pyth Network's trust score?
Pyth Network has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Pyth Network?
Pyth Network's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Pyth Network and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Crypto Exchanges |
| Source | N/A |
Pyth Network Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Crypto by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Pyth Network
What is Pyth Network?
Pyth Network is a crypto exchange — Pyth Network () cryptocurrency. Nerq risk level: moderate risk..
How to Verify Safety
Check regulatory status. Verify Proof of Reserves. Review incident history.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Pyth Network
Key Safety Concerns for crypto exchange
When evaluating any crypto exchange, watch for: regulatory compliance, security incidents, Proof of Reserves, jurisdiction.
Measured Signals
Pyth Network has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Pyth Network has a Trust Score of 48/100 (D).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 50/100 |
| Popularity | 0/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.
What data does Pyth Network collect?
Pyth Network has a privacy score of 40/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Pyth Network Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Pyth Network secure?
Security score: 90/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Pyth Network Security Report
Pyth Network Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
How we calculated this score
Pyth Network's trust score of 48.2/100 (D) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (0/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pyth Network Safe?
What is Pyth Network's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Pyth Network?
How often is Pyth Network's safety score updated?
Can I use Pyth Network in a regulated environment?
Popular in Crypto Exchanges
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.