Is Quick Messaging Zone Safe?
Quick Messaging Zone — Nerq Trust Score 46.0/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Quick Messaging Zone is a Android app with a Nerq Trust Score of 46.0/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 70/100. Popularity: 15/100. Data sourced from Google Play metadata, Data Safety section, Exodus Privacy tracker analysis, and user ratings. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Quick Messaging Zone safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Quick Messaging Zone has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.0/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Quick Messaging Zone's trust score?
Quick Messaging Zone has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.0/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Quick Messaging Zone?
Quick Messaging Zone's strongest signal is security at 70/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Quick Messaging Zone and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Android Apps |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Android by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Quick Messaging Zone
What is Quick Messaging Zone?
Quick Messaging Zone is a Android app — Quick Messaging Zone — Messaging Android app..
How to Verify Safety
Review Data Safety section in Google Play. Check permissions and ad trackers.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Quick Messaging Zone
Key Safety Concerns for Android app
When evaluating any Android app, watch for: excessive permissions, data collection, ad trackers, background data usage.
Measured Signals
Quick Messaging Zone has a Nerq Trust Score of 46/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Quick Messaging Zone has a Trust Score of 46/100 (D).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 70/100 |
| Maintenance | 60/100 |
| Popularity | 15/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 |
| Community | 50/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from Google Play metadata, Data Safety section, Exodus Privacy tracker analysis, and user ratings.
What data does Quick Messaging Zone collect?
Privacy assessment for Quick Messaging Zone is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Quick Messaging Zone secure?
Security score: 70/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Quick Messaging Zone Security Report
How we calculated this score
Quick Messaging Zone's trust score of 46.0/100 (D) is computed from Google Play metadata, Data Safety section, Exodus Privacy tracker analysis, and user ratings. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (70/100), maintenance (60/100), popularity (15/100), quality (30/100), community (50/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 0.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Quick Messaging Zone Safe?
What is Quick Messaging Zone's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Quick Messaging Zone?
Is Quick Messaging Zone safe for kids?
Does Quick Messaging Zone track me?
Popular in Android Apps
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.