Is Safe Messaging Pro Safe?
Safe Messaging Pro — Nerq Trust Score 46.0/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Safe Messaging Pro is a iOS app with a Nerq Trust Score of 46.0/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 70/100. Popularity: 15/100. Data sourced from App Store metadata, privacy labels, permissions analysis, and developer history. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Safe Messaging Pro safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Safe Messaging Pro has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.0/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Safe Messaging Pro's trust score?
Safe Messaging Pro has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.0/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Safe Messaging Pro?
Safe Messaging Pro's strongest signal is security at 70/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Safe Messaging Pro and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | iOS Apps |
| Source | N/A |
Safe Messaging Pro Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Ios by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Safe Messaging Pro
What is Safe Messaging Pro?
Safe Messaging Pro is a iOS app — Safe Messaging Pro — Messaging ios app..
How to Verify Safety
Check App Store privacy labels. Review permissions. Look up developer.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Safe Messaging Pro
Key Safety Concerns for iOS app
When evaluating any iOS app, watch for: excessive permissions, data collection, in-app purchases, age appropriateness.
Measured Signals
Safe Messaging Pro has a Nerq Trust Score of 46/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Safe Messaging Pro has a Trust Score of 46/100 (D).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 70/100 |
| Maintenance | 60/100 |
| Popularity | 15/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 |
| Community | 50/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from App Store metadata, privacy labels, permissions analysis, and developer history.
What data does Safe Messaging Pro collect?
Privacy assessment for Safe Messaging Pro is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Safe Messaging Pro secure?
Security score: 70/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Safe Messaging Pro Security Report
Safe Messaging Pro Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
How we calculated this score
Safe Messaging Pro's trust score of 46.0/100 (D) is computed from App Store metadata, privacy labels, permissions analysis, and developer history. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (70/100), maintenance (60/100), popularity (15/100), quality (30/100), community (50/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 0.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Safe Messaging Pro Safe?
What is Safe Messaging Pro's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Safe Messaging Pro?
Is Safe Messaging Pro safe for kids?
Does Safe Messaging Pro collect my data?
Popular in iOS Apps
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.