¿Es Dracode Seguro?
Dracode — Nerq Trust Score 65.8/100 (Grado C). Basado en el análisis de 5 dimensiones de confianza, se considera generalmente seguro pero con algunas preocupaciones. Última actualización: 2026-04-06.
Usa Dracode con precaución. Dracode es un software tool con un Nerq Trust Score de 65.8/100 (C), basado en 5 dimensiones de datos independientes. Por debajo del umbral verificado de Nerq Seguridad: 0/100. Mantenimiento: 1/100. Popularidad: 0/100. Datos de múltiples fuentes públicas incluyendo registros de paquetes, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev y OpenSSF Scorecard. Última actualización: 2026-04-06. Datos legibles por máquina (JSON).
¿Es Dracode Seguro?
CAUTION — Dracode has a Nerq Trust Score of 65.8/100 (C). Tiene señales de confianza moderadas pero muestra algunas áreas de preocupación that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review seguridad and mantenimiento signals before production deployment.
¿Cuál es la puntuación de confianza de Dracode?
Dracode tiene una Puntuación de Confianza Nerq de 65.8/100, obteniendo un grado C. Esta puntuación se basa en 5 dimensiones medidas independientemente.
¿Cuáles son los hallazgos de seguridad clave de Dracode?
La señal más fuerte de Dracode es cumplimiento con 100/100. No se han detectado vulnerabilidades conocidas. Aún no ha alcanzado el umbral verificado de Nerq de 70+.
¿Qué es Dracode y quién lo mantiene?
| Autor | birko |
| Categoría | Coding |
| Fuente | https://github.com/birko/Dracode |
| Frameworks | openai · anthropic · ollama |
| Protocols | rest · websocket |
Cumplimiento Regulatorio
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Alternativas Populares en coding
Dracode en Otras Plataformas
Mismo desarrollador/empresa en otros registros:
What Is Dracode?
Dracode is a software tool in the coding category: DraCode is an AI-powered coding agent CLI that autonomously performs coding tasks using LLMs.. Nerq Trust Score: 66/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including seguridad vulnerabilities, mantenimiento activity, license cumplimiento, and adopción por la comunidad.
How Nerq Assesses Dracode's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensiones. Here is how Dracode performs in each:
- Seguridad (0/100): Dracode's seguridad posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, seguridad policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Mantenimiento (1/100): Dracode is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentación, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Dracode is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basado en GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 65.8/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Dracode?
Dracode is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Dracode is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its seguridad posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Dracode's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Revisar el/la repository's seguridad policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active mantenimiento.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Dracode's dependency tree. - Reseña permissions — Understand what access Dracode requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Dracode in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Dracode - Revisar el/la license — Confirm that Dracode's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses seguridad concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Dracode
When evaluating whether Dracode is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Dracode processes, stores, and transmits your data. Revisar el/la tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Dracode's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher seguridad risk.
Regularly check for updates to Dracode. Seguridad patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Dracode connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Dracode's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Dracode in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Dracode and the EU AI Act
Dracode is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's cumplimiento assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal cumplimiento.
Best Practices for Using Dracode Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Dracode while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Dracode is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and cumplimiento with your seguridad policies.
Ensure Dracode and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from seguridad patches.
Grant Dracode only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Dracode's seguridad advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Dracode is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Dracode?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Dracode in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional cumplimiento review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Dracode's trust score of 65.8/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual seguridad assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Dracode Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Dracode's score of 65.8/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Dracode favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensiones.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderado in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Dracode and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or mantenimiento patterns change, Dracode's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to seguridad and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced mantenimiento, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Dracode's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Dracode&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — seguridad, mantenimiento, documentación, cumplimiento, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Dracode are strengthening or weakening over time.
Dracode vs Alternativas
In the coding category, Dracode scores 65.8/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Dracode vs AutoGPT — Trust Score: 74.7/100
- Dracode vs ollama — Trust Score: 73.8/100
- Dracode vs langchain — Trust Score: 86.4/100
Puntos Clave
- Dracode has a Trust Score of 65.8/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Dracode shows moderado trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among coding tools, Dracode scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Preguntas Frecuentes
¿Es Dracode Seguro?
¿Cuál es la puntuación de confianza de Dracode?
What are safer alternatives to Dracode?
How often is Dracode's safety score updated?
Can I use Dracode in a regulated environment?
Ver también
Disclaimer: Las puntuaciones de confianza de Nerq son evaluaciones automatizadas basadas en señales disponibles públicamente. No son respaldos ni garantías. Siempre realice su propia diligencia debida.