¿Es Mobileagent Seguro?
Mobileagent — Nerq Puntuación de Confianza 62.5/100 (Grado C). Basado en el análisis de 5 dimensiones de confianza, se considera generalmente seguro pero con algunas preocupaciones. Última actualización: 2026-04-01.
Usa Mobileagent con precaución. Mobileagent is a software tool with a Nerq Puntuación de Confianza de 62.5/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Última actualización: 2026-04-01. Datos legibles por máquina (JSON).
¿Es Mobileagent Seguro?
CAUTION — Mobileagent tiene una Puntuación de Confianza Nerq de 62.5/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
¿Cuál es la puntuación de confianza de Mobileagent?
Mobileagent tiene una Puntuación de Confianza Nerq de 62.5/100, obteniendo un grado C. Esta puntuación se basa en 5 dimensiones medidas independientemente.
¿Cuáles son los hallazgos de seguridad clave de Mobileagent?
La señal más fuerte de Mobileagent es cumplimiento con 100/100. No se han detectado vulnerabilidades conocidas. Aún no ha alcanzado el umbral verificado de Nerq de 70+.
¿Qué es Mobileagent y quién lo mantiene?
| Autor | sheng1111 |
| Categoría | devops |
| Estrellas | 1 |
| Fuente | https://github.com/sheng1111/MobileAgent |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | mcp · rest |
Cumplimiento Regulatorio
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Alternativas Populares en devops
What Is Mobileagent?
Mobileagent is a DevOps tool: MobileAgent is an AI-powered framework for automating Android device control.. It has 1 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Puntuación: 62/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Mobileagent's Safety
Nerq's Puntuación de Confianza is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Mobileagent performs in each:
- Seguridad (0/100): Mobileagent's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Mantenimiento (1/100): Mobileagent is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Mobileagent is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Puntuación de Confianza de 62.5/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Mobileagent?
Mobileagent is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Mobileagent is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Mobileagent's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Revisar the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Mobileagent's dependency tree. - Revisar permissions — Understand what access Mobileagent requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Mobileagent in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=MobileAgent - Revisar the license — Confirm that Mobileagent's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Mobileagent
When evaluating whether Mobileagent is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Mobileagent processes, stores, and transmits your data. Revisar the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Mobileagent's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Mobileagent. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Mobileagent connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Mobileagent's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Mobileagent in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Mobileagent and the EU AI Act
Mobileagent is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Mobileagent Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Mobileagent while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Mobileagent is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Mobileagent and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Mobileagent only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Mobileagent's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Mobileagent is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Mobileagent?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Mobileagent in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Mobileagent de 62.5/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Mobileagent Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Puntuación de Confianza is 63/100. Mobileagent's score of 62.5/100 is near the category average of 63/100.
This places Mobileagent in line with the typical DevOps tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Puntuación de Confianza History
Nerq continuously monitors Mobileagent and recalculates its Puntuación de Confianza as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Mobileagent's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Mobileagent's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=MobileAgent&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Mobileagent are strengthening or weakening over time.
Mobileagent vs Alternatives
In the devops category, Mobileagent tiene una puntuación de 62.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Mobileagent vs ansible — Trust Puntuación: 84.3/100
- Mobileagent vs Flowise — Trust Puntuación: 76.9/100
- Mobileagent vs learn-claude-code — Trust Puntuación: 81.5/100
Puntos Clave
- Mobileagent tiene una Puntuación de Confianza de 62.5/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Mobileagent shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among DevOps tools, Mobileagent scores near the category average of 63/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Preguntas Frecuentes
¿Es Mobileagent safe to use?
¿Cuál es la puntuación de confianza de Mobileagent?
¿Cuáles son alternativas más seguras a Mobileagent?
How often is Mobileagent's safety score updated?
Can I use Mobileagent in a regulated environment?
Disclaimer: Las puntuaciones de confianza de Nerq son evaluaciones automatizadas basadas en señales disponibles públicamente. No son respaldos ni garantías. Siempre realice su propia diligencia debida.